Posts Tagged ‘Louisiana’
Politico reports that the Obama Administration ended the offshore drilling ban “a month early”.
Although this is good news for Gulf State economies, don’t be fooled into thinking their suffering prompted President Obama to proper action.
No, good old-fashioned backroom politics got it done. Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) placed a “hold” on the nomination of Jack Lew as director of the White House Office of Management and Budget. The action effectively held the nomination hostage until Landrieu relented.
In other words, she threw a senatorial hissy. And, more importantly, Obama caved.
Is it any wonder Ahmadinejad and Kim aren’t persuaded by Obama’s tough talk? If you can’t move Mary Landrieu off a dime, well… where are you really?
But, back to the drilling ban. As Ed Morrissey writes at Hot Air:
A month early? Try at least two months too late. A study conducted by Barack Obama’s own hand-picked commission showed that not only was the blanket moratorium no longer needed, it was never necessary in the first place. (emphasis added)
This presidential decision had nothing to do protecting the environment. While the drilling moratorium was in place, the Obama Administration approved a $1 billion loan to Mexico for expanded operations in the Gulf.
If the administration was so concerned with potential ecological damage, why was it permissible for Mexico to expand drilling operations in the same body of water? Does Mexican crude oil not stick to water fowl, kill fish or pollute beaches? Of course, it does.
The offshore drilling ban was pure leftist politics on a number of levels. First, the ban was an obvious sop to environmentalist groups who questioned Obama’s commitment to the cause. Second, the moratorium was a “dead fish” message sent to the oil companies. And third, the action was based on the wealth redistribution dogma central to Obama’s political ideology.
All of that was certainly much more important to Obama than the jobs of 10,000 Americans. Aren’t those the same American workers Democrats always claim to protect? Oh well, the ends justify the means, right?
What delicious irony that the whole plan was brought down by bare-knuckled politics as practiced by a liberal Democrat who benefits from oil industry campaign donations.
That President Obama sure has them all shaking in their boots.
© 2010 by kens*ten. All rights reserved.
The United States Constitution mandates a national census every ten years. The reason: the apportionment of seats in the House of Representatives among the various states. This redistribution is based on population. As states gain or lose population in proportion to the other states, their respective shares of the 435 House seats changes.
A review of preliminary 2010 Census data by Election Data Services (EDS) points toward a Republican advantage in the 2012 election. The Census Bureau releases their official report in late December.
EDS projections suggest gains by “Red States” such as Texas (+4), Florida (+2), Arizona (+1), Georgia (+1), South Carolina (+1) and Utah (+1). “Swing State” Nevada and “Blue State” Washington also may gain one seat each.
When some states gain, other states must lose. The brunt of the lost seats will occur in Blue States: New York (-2), Illinois (-1), Iowa (-1), Massachusetts (-1), Michigan (-1), New Jersey (-1) and Pennsylvania (-1). Swing States Ohio (-2) and Missouri (-1) are expected to lose seats along with Red State Louisiana (-1).
The net results: Red States +9, Blue States -7 and Swing States -2.
The impact these gains and losses will have on the House in 2012 is more problematic. Each state is responsible for dividing their geographic area into districts of nearly exact population. The ensuing re-districting battles — especially in states losing one or more seats — will largely hinge on which party controls the state legislature. The vast majority of states are holding state legislative elections in November. With the GOP riding a nationwide wave of frustration, they are poised to capture many legislatures from the Democrats. When the GOP lacks a majority, Republican governors can often use the threat of veto to leverage a more beneficial map. But, much will depend on local political conditions.
As the number of Electoral Votes per state is the sum of its House seats plus two (for their Senators), this reapportionment makes it a little easier for the GOP presidential candidate to reach the 270-EV majority. Assuming they run a candidate that can win in 2012.
© 2010 by kens*ten. All rights reserved.
My second favorite governor right now is Bobby Jindal (R-LA). New Jersey’s Chris Christie is ‘Da Bomb’ only because he’s fighting a Democrat-controlled state legislature. Louisiana is a solid Red State.
Jindal has been a vocal critic of President Obama’s offshore drilling moratorium. At a rally in Lafayette, Louisiana Jindal passed along a message to POTUS:
“We don’t want a BP check. We don’t want an unemployment check. Let us go back to work.”